首页> 外文OA文献 >The Prodromal Questionnaire: A case for IRT-based adaptive testing of psychotic experiences?
【2h】

The Prodromal Questionnaire: A case for IRT-based adaptive testing of psychotic experiences?

机译:前驱问卷:基于IRT的精神病适应性测试案例?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) for positive and negative psychotic experiences were developed and tested in N=5705 help-seeking, non-psychotic young individuals. Instead of presenting all items, CATs choose a varying number of different items during test administration depending on respondents' previous answers, reducing the average number of items while still obtaining accurate person estimates. We assessed the appropriateness of two-parameter logistic models to positive and negative symptoms of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ), computed measurement precision of all items and resulting adaptive tests along psychotic dimensions by Real Data Simulations (RDS), and computed indices for criterion and predictive validities of the CATs. For all items, mean absolute differences between observed and expected response probabilities were smaller than 0.02. CAT-POS predicted transition to psychosis and duration of hospitalization in individuals at-risk for psychosis, and CAT-NEG was suggestively related to later functioning. Regarding psychosis risk classifications of help-seeking individuals, CAT-POS performed less than the PQ-16. Adaptive testing based on self-reported positive and negative symptoms in individuals at-risk for psychosis is a feasible method to select patients for further risk classification. These promising findings need to be replicated prospectively in a non-selective sample that also includes non-at-risk individuals. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:开发了用于积极和消极精神病经历的计算机自适应测试(CAT),并在N = 5705寻求帮助的非精神病年轻人中进行了测试。 CAT不会显示所有项目,而是在测试管理期间根据受访者的先前答案选择不同数量的不同项目,从而减少了平均项目数,同时仍获得了准确的人员估算值。我们评估了两参数对数模型对前驱问卷(PQ)的正面和负面症状的适用性,通过Real Data Simulations(RDS)计算的所有项目的测量精度以及沿着精神病维度的自适应测试,并计算了标准和指标CAT的预测有效性。对于所有项目,观察到的和预期的响应概率之间的平均绝对差小于0.02。 CAT-POS预测患有精神病风险的个体会过渡到精神病和住院时间,而CAT-NEG暗示与以后的功能有关。关于寻求帮助者的精神病风险分类,CAT-POS的表现低于PQ-16。基于自我报告的精神病风险个体的阳性和阴性症状的适应性测试是选择患者进行进一步风险分类的可行方法。这些有前途的发现需要在非选择性样本中进行前瞻性复制,该样本还包括非高风险个体。版权所有(c)2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号